Why Move to a Data Center?
A recent study by IDG discovered that roughly two-thirds of organizations already store at least some of the data in a server colocation data centre. Even among organizations that rely solely on on-premises facilities, over 70 percent have plans to migrate some data into a colocation facility at some point later on. Interestingly, the magnitude of a company seems to have no impact on whether or not a business pursues a data centre strategy, with companies smaller and bigger than 5,000 employees equally likely to colocate at least some of the operations using a centre.
Backup and redundancy appear to be the best motivator for current colocation tendencies, using a bit over half of companies surveyed indicating as such. A data center’s expandable storage capacities are an obvious attraction. Although massive amounts of data are produced every day by consumers along with other network processes, advancements in data storage have banished the longstanding fears that data centers will be running out of space.
Data centre statistics indicate that about 80 percent of businesses are considering using colocation facilities to encourage some combination of critical projects and software. As companies adopt the usage of data analytics, which sorts through the massive amounts of unstructured information accumulated at all levels of these networks, they confront escalating processing demands that are very tricky to meet with an on-premises solution. It may simply expand its capability by physically adding more servers to supply the excess processing punch, if a company has a data center that is private. Does this require a substantial capital expenditure, but in addition, it raises costs in the short term and long term. Those servers must be powered and chilled, and if they are not required in the future, the business is stuck paying for them.
By migrating IT infrastructure into a data center, especially one supplying SDDC services, companies can easily scale their computing requirements by purchasing more server capacity. If their demands change, they always have the ability to scale down in the future, and they’re also able to utilize the data center environment to leverage cloud computing tools from a large number of providers.
Regardless of their existing data center model, most organizations cite uptime reliability because one of the primary concerns with their IT infrastructure. Given the high prices of downtime, it is no wonder that always ranked high across a number of verticals IDG. Within an solution, organizations are responsible for maintaining their particular service, which may be. Colocation data centers can take these concerns off the hands of a company with high their SLA uptime reliability. With distant hands teams in the ready to make sure that once they are needed by companies all servers remain up and running, data centers are an attractive solution for complex network infrastructures that provide services and must maintain data accessibility. A data centre will generally provide better SLA reliability, for companies contemplating a colocation vs cloud option.
While every company faces distinct IT pressures, a number are electing to make the shift to colocation data centers to take advantage of the versatility and dependability. With advancements in server visualization and cloud architectures such as hybrid deployments, it’s easier than ever for companies to utilize the resources of data centre facilities while also keeping up the level of visibility and control they need over their assets.
Colocation Costs vs Cloud Costs
Colocation services pose higher upfront costs compared to the cloud-based solution. That’s because customers must purchase hardware instead of migrating data. However, the pricing structure of cloud will tip the balance back toward colocation. Although cloud providers are scalable and offer a lot of flexibility and power, getting access may get extremely expensive, very quickly.
On the flip side, going the colocation route means having to maintain and replace equipment with time. Having a cloud-based solution, the provider handles all updates. The cloud could present a simpler, if not always cheaper, solution When an organization isn’t prepared to take into consideration how it will manage the server refresh cycle of its IT infrastructure.