A recent study by IDG discovered that about two-thirds of organizations already store at least a few of the information in a colocation data center. Even among organizations that rely on on-premises facilities, over 70 percent have plans to migrate some information into a server colocation facility at some point later on. Interestingly, the magnitude of a provider seems to have no impact on whether a company pursues a data centre plan, with firms larger and smaller than 5,000 employees equally likely to colocate at least a few of their operations with a third party centre.
Backup and redundancy seem to be the best motivator for current colocation trends, using a bit over half of companies surveyed indicating as such. A data center’s readily expandable storage capabilities are an attraction. Although amounts of data are generated daily by consumers and network procedures, advancements in data storage have banished the fears that info centers will soon be running out of space.
Data center statistics indicate that roughly 80 percent of businesses are thinking about using colocation facilities to support some combination of crucial projects and applications. As more companies adopt the use of data analytics, which forms through the huge amounts of unstructured data gathered at all levels of their networksthey face escalating processing requirements which are difficult to meet with an solution. If a company has a private data center, it may simply expand its computing capability by physically adding more servers to provide the processing punch. Not only does this require a capital investment, but it also raises costs in the short term and long term. Those servers chilled and have to be powered, and even if they’re not needed in the long run, the business is still stuck paying for them.
By migrating IT infrastructure into a data center, especially one supplying SDDC services, companies can quickly scale up their computing needs by purchasing more server capability. They can always scale in the future when their needs change, and they can use the data center environment to leverage cloud computing resources from a multitude of providers.
Irrespective of their current data centre model, most organizations cite uptime reliability because one of the principal concerns with their IT infrastructure. Given the high prices of downtime, it is no wonder that consistently ranked high across a number of verticals IDG. In an solution, organizations are solely responsible for maintaining their service, which can be. Colocation data centers may take these concerns off a organization’s palms. With control teams in the ready to ensure that servers remain up and running when firms need them most, data centers are an attractive solution for complex network infrastructures that provide online services and must maintain data accessibility. A data center will normally provide greater SLA reliability for businesses considering a vs cloud solution.
While every company faces distinct IT pressures, a number are preferring to make the shift to colocation data centers to take advantage of their versatility and dependability. With progress in server visualization and cloud architectures like hybrid deployments, it is simpler than ever for companies to use the resources of data centre facilities while also keeping up the level of visibility and control they require over their valuable assets.
Colocation Prices vs Cloud Prices
Colocation services present higher upfront costs compared to the cloud-based alternative. That’s because customers need to buy hardware rather than migrating data to the servers of some cloud provider. On the other hand, the pricing structure of cloud hosting providers will tip the balance back toward colocation. Although cloud providers give a great deal of flexibility and power and are scalable, getting access to those features may get very expensive.
On the other hand, going the colocation route means needing to maintain and replace equipment over time. Having a solution, all updates are managed by the supplier. The cloud may present an easier, if not always cheaper, alternative When an organization is not ready to think about how it will manage the server refresh cycle of its own IT infrastructure.